H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Laura Dupont H2H: 1-0

Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Dupont in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1970 Indianapolis round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-1 6-3 Laura Dupont Match data Jul 31, 1970* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Laura Dupont
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,840 0 5
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,732 0 5
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,718 0 6
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,753 0 35 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,639 0 6
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,770 0 36 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 6
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,718 0 36 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,592 0 6
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Laura Dupont
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Laura Dupont
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.42
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.79
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.48
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.59
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.93 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -179 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -0.21
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.13 1977 1840 143.1 — — — — -95 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -3.41
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.55 1978 1732 131.1 — — — — -26 +50 -51 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 +1.56
30 1975 1823 140.3 — — — — -82 +145 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.41 1979 1817 142.7 — — — — -23 -30 -121 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 +0.32
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 -0.37 1980 1719 129.1 — — — — -35 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -3.14
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 1981 1639 117.4 — — — — +55 +7 +66 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.30
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.37 1982 1594 108.3 — — — — +93 -39 +48 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.25
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.52 1983 1593 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31
35 1980 1701 129.0 — — — — — +185 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1709 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -121 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -1.24 — 1896 136.3 — — — — -33 -4 -73 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.