H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Linda Tuero H2H: 2-2

Gail Sherriff and Linda Tuero are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Linda Tuero won the 1971 Indianapolis semifinal 5-7 6-3 4-3 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Linda Tuero
USA Age 75

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Linda Tuero 5-7 6-3 4-3 (ret.) Gail Sherriff Match data Aug 14, 1971* SF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Linda Tuero 7-5 6-1 Gail Sherriff Match data Aug 2, 1970* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Gail Sherriff 6-2 6-2 Linda Tuero Match data Jul 27, 1969* F Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Gail Sherriff 6-2 6-1 Linda Tuero Match data Jul 19, 1969* SF Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Linda Tuero — — — 1,997 175 78 69.2% 0 0 0 1 12 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Linda Tuero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1968 29–10 74.4% — 1,734 0 3
18 — — — — — — — 1969 33–16 67.3% — 1,793 0 5
19 — — — — — — — 1970 22–6 78.6% — 1,873 0 9
20 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,862 0 9
21 — — — — — — — 1972 45–15 75.0% — 1,894 0 13
22 — — — — — — — 1973 23–17 57.5% — 1,821 0 13
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 — — — — — — —
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 — — — — — — —
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 — — — — — — —
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 — — — — — — —
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 — — — — — — —
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,797 0 13
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 — — — — — — —
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 — — — — — — —
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 — — — — — — —
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 — — — — — — —
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Linda Tuero
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 1 2 50.0% 18 5 23 78.3% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 16 4 20 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 5 2 7 71.4% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 14 3 17 82.4% 29 7 36 80.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 6 3 9 66.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 29 10 39 74.4% 109 39 148 73.6% 27 24 51 52.9% 4 5 9 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Linda Tuero
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1734 135.7 — — — — — +54 -40 66.7% +1.71 9–2 (82%) — — -0.54
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1794 136.0 — — — — -155 +107 -64 62.7% +1.15 9–3 (75%) — — -1.43
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1873 140.9 — — — — — +125 — 74.1% +1.79 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -1.10
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1863 136.1 — — — — -161 +162 -176 60.9% +1.06 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.17
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1894 152.7 — — — — -16 +210 -248 71.4% +1.79 10–5 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 -1.20
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1822 130.7 — — — — +21 +161 — 54.5% +0.11 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 102.7 -0.14
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1979 1798 97.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.07
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 1998 144.8 — — — — -36 +142 -101 65.0% +1.27 40–14 (74%) 7–6 (54%) 109.7 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.