H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Liz Smylie H2H: 0-1
Liz Smylie holds a 1–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Smylie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Liz Smylie won the 1980 Brisbane quarterfinal 2-6 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 63
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 1980* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | QF | Grass | Liz Smylie | 2-6 6-2 7-6 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Liz Smylie | #501 | #20 | 29 | 1,824 | 161 | 188 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Liz Smylie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #36 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1986 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #114 | 1,669 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1987 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #27 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,597 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1989 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #53 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1991 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,599 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | 1993 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,550 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #192 | 1,515 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |