H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 2-1
Gail Sherriff holds a 2–1 lead over Marie Pinterova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1980 Nice quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 81
Right-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1980* | Nice | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-3 6-2 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Apr 13, 1973* | Miami Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1971* | Catania | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |