H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Marijke Jansen H2H: 3-0
Gail Sherriff holds a 3–0 lead over Marijke Jansen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gail Sherriff leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1970 Nice Intl final 7-5 6-8 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1970* | Nice Intl | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 7-5 6-8 6-2 | Marijke Jansen | Match data |
| Mar 29, 1969* | Nice Lawn Club | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-3 6-4 | Marijke Jansen | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1968* | Nice | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-3 6-1 | Marijke Jansen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Marijke Jansen | — | — | — | 1,817 | 94 | 73 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Marijke Jansen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1968 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1969 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1970 | 18–8 | 69.2% | — | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1972 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1973 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | 1974 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,727 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | 1977 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | 1980 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |