H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gail Sherriff vs Naoko Sato H2H: 0-1
Naoko Sato holds a 1–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sato leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Naoko Sato won the 1980 Sydney second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 1980* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Naoko Sato | 6-4 6-4 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
| Naoko Sato | — | — | — | 1,637 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gail Sherriff | Naoko Sato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 | 1979 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 | 1980 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 | 1981 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |