H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Rosie Casals H2H: 1-8

Rosie Casals holds an 8–1 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Rosie Casals leads 4–1 on clay and 4–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosie Casals won the 1975 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gail Sherriff
FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 8
9 main-draw meetings
Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosie Casals 6-2 2-6 6-1 Gail Sherriff Match data Jun 25, 1975* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Rosie Casals 6-0 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data Jul 7, 1971* SF Venice WTA 250 Clay
Gail Sherriff 6-2 6-3 Rosie Casals Match data Aug 1, 1970* SF Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 8-6 5-7 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data Jul 25, 1970* SF Cincinnati Open WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 6-3 2-6 6-1 Gail Sherriff Match data Apr 30, 1970* R32 Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 6-4 6-4 Gail Sherriff Match data Apr 18, 1970* R16 Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay
Rosie Casals 4-6 6-2 6-2 Gail Sherriff Match data Jan 26, 1969* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Rosie Casals 8-6 7-5 Gail Sherriff Match data Jan 17, 1969* R16 Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Rosie Casals 6-1 6-0 Gail Sherriff Match data Jan 28, 1968* R16 Australian Championships Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Rosie Casals #207 #6 — 2,212 594 322 64.8% 0 0 0 2 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Rosie Casals
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4
22 — — — — — — — 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,140 0 12
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,004 0 12
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,054 0 12
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,011 0 12
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,826 0 12
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,677 0 12
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,752 0 35 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,685 0 12
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,769 0 36 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,666 0 12
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,719 0 36 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,660 0 12
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,608 0 12
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,546 0 12
39 — — — — — — — 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 12
40 — — — — — — — 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12
41 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 12
42 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 12

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Rosie Casals
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Rosie Casals
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -7.80
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -11.01
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1974 2140 162.3 — — — — +99 +10 +10 69.8% +1.25 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -8.65
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1975 2004 147.2 — — — — +23 +89 +133 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -3.22
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.94 1976 2127 162.3 — — — — +41 -44 +54 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.96
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.20 1977 2055 157.2 — — — — +115 -41 +133 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.12 1978 2011 156.1 — — — — +88 -37 +114 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 95.9 -4.25
30 1975 1824 140.3 — — — — -83 +144 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.18 1979 1826 144.2 — — — — +54 +112 +237 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.11
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 +0.01 1980 1678 130.2 — — — — +17 — +237 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.2 -1.94
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.46 1981 1685 134.1 — — — — +86 +184 +145 46.0% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 0–4 (0%) 92.6 +0.30
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.81 1982 1666 113.8 — — — — +42 — +126 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.59
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.54 1983 1661 117.2 — — — — -26 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.27
35 1980 1702 129.0 — — — — — +183 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.49 1984 1608 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56
36 1981 1710 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 1985 1573 92.4 — — — — +8 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 1986 1547 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — 0.00
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1522 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1499 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1476 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -122 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -0.90 — 2212 159.2 — — — — +64 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–119 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.2 -9.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.