H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Sharon Walsh Pete H2H: 0-1

Sharon Walsh Pete holds a 1–0 lead over Gail Sherriff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sharon Walsh Pete leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sharon Walsh Pete won the 1972 Bournemouth quarterfinal 6-2 2-6 6-3.

FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sharon Walsh Pete 6-2 2-6 6-3 Gail Sherriff Match data May 13, 1972* QF Bournemouth WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,895 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Sharon Walsh Pete
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,864 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,737 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,733 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,654 0 4
22 — — — — — — — 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,768 0 7
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,619 0 7
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,719 0 7
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,678 0 7
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,615 0 7
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,709 0 7
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,840 0 8
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,757 0 8
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,787 0 8
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,753 0 35 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,797 0 8
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,770 0 36 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,623 0 8
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,718 0 36 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,599 0 8
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Sharon Walsh Pete
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 10 5 15 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 9 20 55.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 12 7 19 63.2% 13 12 25 52.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 8 12 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 12 4 16 75.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1975 6 8 14 42.9% 0 8 8 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1977 6 6 12 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1978 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 5 9 14 35.7%
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1979 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1980 4 8 12 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1985 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 6 7 14.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 96 102 198 48.5% 29 52 81 35.8% 109 102 211 51.7% 59 83 142 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Sharon Walsh Pete
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1485 98.7 — — — — +12 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1525 118.4 — — — — +30 — +3 50.0% +0.21 0–4 (0%) — — -0.47
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1865 136.8 — — — — +54 — -174 64.2% +1.04 8–4 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 107.0 -1.42
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1738 114.5 — — — — +79 -236 -11 50.0% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +1.67
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1734 131.3 — — — — +83 -203 +10 51.9% +0.26 10–9 (53%) 1–2 (33%) 98.9 +2.42
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1655 130.0 — — — — +19 -30 +158 52.9% +0.26 12–9 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.5 +4.41
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1768 138.6 — — — — +77 -202 +15 56.4% +0.41 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 +0.33
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1975 1662 127.7 — — — — +110 -191 — 32.0% -1.19 1–6 (14%) 3–7 (30%) 89.3 +0.15
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1976 1619 108.6 — — — — +50 -163 +179 41.0% -0.90 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +1.29
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1977 1720 135.3 — — — — +62 -286 +40 42.0% -0.74 5–0 (100%) 5–2 (71%) 109.4 -1.10
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1978 1679 127.1 — — — — -13 -250 +61 37.5% -0.98 6–6 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 -0.71
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.93 1979 1615 121.5 — — — — -26 — +89 41.3% -0.61 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +3.88
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.13 1980 1710 132.4 — — — — -130 -187 +1 44.4% -0.57 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 106.4 -3.84
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.55 1981 1841 144.0 — — — — -77 — +12 56.3% +0.44 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 -2.17
30 1975 1823 140.3 — — — — -82 +145 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.41 1982 1758 137.6 — — — — -81 — +74 37.9% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–7 (13%) 92.6 -1.62
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 -0.37 1983 1788 131.0 — — — — -87 — +58 50.8% +0.14 3–4 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 99.8 -1.20
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 1984 1798 135.6 — — — — -156 — +84 40.0% -0.72 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -2.34
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.37 1985 1623 115.8 — — — — +9 — +74 32.1% -1.32 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 +0.34
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.52 1986 1599 97.4 — — — — -3 — — 30.8% -1.38 1–0 — — +0.42
35 1980 1701 129.0 — — — — — +185 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.42 1987 1598 109.9 — — — — -27 — +70 42.4% -0.71 4–3 (57%) 3–4 (43%) 100.5 +1.50
36 1981 1709 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 1988 1507 84.9 — — — — — — +45 14.3% -2.93 0–2 — — +0.46
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -121 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -1.24 — 1896 135.2 — — — — +10 -149 +35 46.7% -0.25 92–85 (52%) 47–51 (48%) 99.8 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.