H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Gail Sherriff vs Terry Holladay H2H: 1-0

Gail Sherriff holds a 1–0 lead over Terry Holladay in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gail Sherriff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gail Sherriff won the 1974 Indianapolis round of 16 6-1 6-2.

FRA Age 81 Right-Handed
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 70 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gail Sherriff 6-1 6-2 Terry Holladay Match data Aug 9, 1974* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gail Sherriff — — — 1,998 346 145 70.5% 0 0 0 0 38 38
Terry Holladay — #39 7 1,945 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gail Sherriff Terry Holladay
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 2–3 40.0% — 1,473 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1973 4–2 66.7% — 1,507 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 12–17 41.4% — 1,563 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 32–23 58.2% — 1,758 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1976 28–20 58.3% — 1,896 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1977 15–15 50.0% — 1,943 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1978 2–8 20.0% — 1,867 0 1
23 1968 69–14 83.1% — 1,861 0 10 1979 17–18 48.6% — 1,832 0 1
24 1969 45–22 67.2% — 1,801 0 14 1980 25–21 54.3% — 1,826 0 1
25 1970 52–19 73.2% — 1,938 0 18 1981 4–12 25.0% — 1,673 0 1
26 1971 49–20 71.0% — 1,929 0 20 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,639 0 1
27 1972 35–13 72.9% — 1,837 0 25 1983 9–8 52.9% — 1,679 0 1
28 1973 3–7 30.0% — 1,742 0 25 1984 15–16 48.4% #50 1,677 0 1
29 1974 30–10 75.0% — 1,854 0 31 1985 9–16 36.0% — 1,609 0 1
30 1975 17–10 63.0% — 1,823 0 35 1986 5–8 38.5% #103 1,628 0 1
31 1976 18–10 64.3% — 1,790 0 35 1987 0–9 0.0% #315 1,512 0 1
32 1977 0–3 0.0% — 1,753 0 35 — — — — — — —
33 1978 15–6 71.4% — 1,770 0 36 — — — — — — —
34 1979 1–4 20.0% — 1,718 0 36 — — — — — — —
35 1980 9–5 64.3% — 1,701 0 37 — — — — — — —
36 1981 3–1 75.0% — 1,709 0 38 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,697 0 38 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gail Sherriff Terry Holladay
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 9 23 60.9%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1968 — — — — 58 8 66 87.9% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1979 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 9 14 35.7%
24 1969 3 2 5 60.0% 26 9 35 74.3% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 12 23 47.8%
25 1970 — — — — 39 11 50 78.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1971 — — — — 29 11 40 72.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1972 6 1 7 85.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1983 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1974 — — — — 26 6 32 81.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1975 2 1 3 66.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1976 — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 — — — — 6 2 8 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 7 19 63.2% 244 78 322 75.8% 69 51 120 57.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — 64 69 133 48.1% 23 27 50 46.0% 42 39 81 51.9% 50 64 114 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gail Sherriff Terry Holladay
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1489 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.08
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1473 99.7 — — — — +72 — — 45.5% -0.27 0–1 0–1 — +1.13
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1507 105.7 — — — — +97 — — 66.7% +1.08 — 1–0 — +1.72
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1564 120.1 — — — — -36 +43 — 44.6% -0.46 2–5 (29%) 3–1 (75%) 97.9 +0.85
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1759 130.6 — — — — -20 -115 -113 57.1% +0.64 10–10 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 +2.59
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1897 148.1 — — — — +31 -249 -165 59.2% +0.31 4–4 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 105.5 -3.36
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1943 148.6 — — — — -3 — -137 51.5% +0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.6 -5.31
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1867 129.3 — — — — -10 — -63 37.5% -0.92 1–5 (17%) 1–3 (25%) 94.0 -1.91
23 1968 1861 142.2 — — — — — +190 -283 81.1% +2.55 7–4 (64%) — — +1.11 1979 1833 140.5 — — — — -1 — — 49.3% +0.03 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 98.2 -0.76
24 1969 1802 140.9 — — — — -199 +203 -86 70.4% +1.76 2–5 (29%) — — -0.45 1980 1827 148.3 — — — — +10 — -7 52.0% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 -3.51
25 1970 1938 147.4 — — — — -325 +71 -84 69.8% +1.56 7–4 (64%) — — -3.95 1981 1674 108.7 — — — — +74 — +80 30.3% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.08
26 1971 1929 151.8 — — — — — +128 -64 70.3% +1.59 8–8 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 97.7 -3.26 1982 1640 94.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.01
27 1972 1837 140.7 — — — — -55 +123 -77 68.7% +1.58 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +0.93 1983 1680 131.9 — — — — +15 — +102 57.1% +0.28 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.29
28 1973 1743 112.1 — — — — -27 +149 — 39.1% -0.52 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.1 +0.13 1984 1678 119.9 — — — — +9 — +70 46.8% -0.44 9–6 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 100.8 +1.92
29 1974 1854 142.4 — — — — — +166 -128 72.0% +1.63 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — -0.55 1985 1609 119.2 — — — — +25 — +87 40.7% -0.75 4–5 (44%) 1–5 (17%) 98.1 +0.39
30 1975 1823 140.3 — — — — -82 +145 — 58.1% +0.79 6–2 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 103.4 -0.41 1986 1629 114.9 — — — — -5 — +91 40.7% -0.70 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.22
31 1976 1790 139.8 — — — — — +74 — 63.9% +1.52 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 90.7 -0.37 1987 1512 88.0 — — — — +45 — +94 5.3% -3.53 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
32 1977 1753 108.3 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1978 1770 126.7 — — — — — +81 -68 60.4% +0.92 7–1 (88%) 3–2 (60%) 105.3 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1979 1719 114.6 — — — — — — — 27.3% -0.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1980 1701 129.0 — — — — — +185 -49 65.6% +1.69 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1981 1709 113.1 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.11 1–0 — — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1698 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1999 147.8 — — — — -121 +140 -103 68.6% +1.59 51–46 (53%) 15–15 (50%) 92.8 -1.24 — 1946 138.7 — — — — +11 -62 -19 48.8% -0.14 51–55 (48%) 33–39 (46%) 98.8 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.