H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gala Leon Garcia vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 1-0

Gala Leon Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2001 Knokke-Heist round of 16 6-4 6-2.

ESP Age 52 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gala Leon Garcia #61 6-4 6-2 Amanda Hopmans #171 Match data Jul 20, 2001* R16 Knokke-Heist Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gala Leon Garcia #361 #27 978 1,836 117 141 45.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gala Leon Garcia Amanda Hopmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1995 0–1 0.0% #135 1,495 0 0
22 1996 5–11 31.2% #89 1,524 0 0
23 1997 11–13 45.8% #56 1,615 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 1998 19–18 51.4% #53 1,704 0 0 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 1999 16–17 48.5% #53 1,722 0 0 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0
26 2000 23–19 54.8% #31 1,759 0 1
27 2001 24–22 52.2% #41 1,731 0 1
28 2002 10–23 30.3% #130 1,567 0 1
29 2003 5–9 35.7% #96 1,523 0 1
30 2004 4–8 33.3% #221 1,498 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gala Leon Garcia Amanda Hopmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1995 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 1998 3 4 7 42.9% 14 11 25 56.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 2 5 7 28.6% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2000 2 9 11 18.2% 20 8 28 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 7 10 17 41.2% 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2002 5 9 14 35.7% 5 13 18 27.8% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2004 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 23 47 70 32.9% 89 80 169 52.7% 5 11 16 31.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gala Leon Garcia Amanda Hopmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1995 1495 105.6 0.0% -3.50 -0.24
22 1996 1524 123.4 -4 +68 37.5% -0.93 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) -0.23
23 1997 1616 123.2 -95 +18 +30 46.3% -0.09 3–3 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 98.7 +0.09 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 1998 1705 123.5 -152 +26 -42 47.1% -0.32 9–4 (69%) 5–3 (63%) 106.4 -0.18 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 1999 1722 136.4 -171 +39 52.1% +0.03 1–6 (14%) 4–1 (80%) 96.0 -1.10 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
26 2000 1760 134.6 -268 +140 49.5% +0.20 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 104.3 -2.70
27 2001 1731 138.8 -164 +156 50.5% +0.09 9–6 (60%) 2–6 (25%) 99.5 -0.92
28 2002 1568 117.9 -24 +100 34.7% -0.68 5–6 (45%) 0–6 (0%) 94.7 -0.98
29 2003 1524 111.5 -2.37 -2.26 0.718 42.8% +111 45.2% -0.52 1–4 (20%) 1–1 +0.46
30 2004 1499 99.1 -2.59 -0.97 0.781 45.1% +30 +65 34.6% -1.39 3–1 (75%) 1–1 +0.68
Career 1836 133.0 -2.46 -1.71 0.745 43.8% -125 +85 -15 45.6% -0.25 44–38 (54%) 19–28 (40%) 98.4 -1.98 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.