H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-1
Gala Leon Garcia and Asa Carlsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on carpet, while Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2002 Miami first round 6-3 6-7(0) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-3 6-7(0) 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1996* | Kremlin Cup | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Asa Carlsson | 6-4 7-5 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Gala Leon Garcia | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |