H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Barbara Paulus H2H: 2-1
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Paulus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 1998 Maria Lankowitz quarterfinal 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1998* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1997* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Barbara Paulus | 6-2 6-0 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | Barbara Paulus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Barbara Paulus | #347 | #10 | 1,696 | 1,956 | 229 | 138 | 62.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Barbara Paulus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #165 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 19–10 | 65.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 32–14 | 69.6% | #15 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,868 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #209 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #23 | 1,802 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #13 | 1,876 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #24 | 1,860 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |