H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 3-1
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 3–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2002 Sopot third round 6-2 0-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2002* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2002* | Brussels | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1999* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-0 1-6 7-5 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Aug 1, 1998* | Sopot | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |