H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Elena Pampoulova H2H: 1-0
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Pampoulova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 1998 Maria Lankowitz fourth round 5-7 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BUL
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1998* | Maria Lankowitz | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Elena Pampoulova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Elena Pampoulova | — | — | — | 1,658 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Elena Pampoulova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–10 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |