H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 0-1
Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 1–0 lead over Gala Leon Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2000 Indian Wells second round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2000* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |