H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Iva Majoli H2H: 2-2
Gala Leon Garcia and Iva Majoli are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2002 Helsinki third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2002* | Helsinki | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-2 6-2 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Apr 4, 2002* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-3 6-7(2) 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-3 6-1 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| May 9, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-7 6-4 6-2 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |