H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Janet Lee H2H: 2-0
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 2–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2001 Tokyo third round 6-4 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Janet Lee | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 6-7 7-6 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Janet Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |