H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Patricia Wartusch H2H: 1-1
Gala Leon Garcia and Patricia Wartusch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Wartusch leads 1–0 on clay, while Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patricia Wartusch won the 1999 Sao Paulo semifinal 6-1 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1999* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Patricia Wartusch | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1998 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Gala Leon Garcia | 4-6 7-6 7-6 | Patricia Wartusch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Patricia Wartusch | #1,235 | #65 | 512 | 1,641 | 43 | 61 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Patricia Wartusch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #90 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #150 | 1,467 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |