H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Gala Leon Garcia vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 3-0
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 3–0 lead over Rita Kuti-Kis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2001 US Open first round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1999* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 7-6 6-1 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 6-1 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gala Leon Garcia | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |