H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Galina Voskoboeva vs Vesna Dolonc H2H: 1-2
Vesna Dolonc holds a 2–1 lead over Galina Voskoboeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Vesna Dolonc leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Vesna Dolonc won the 2012 Moscow third round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 36
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2012* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Vesna Dolonc | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Galina Voskoboeva | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2012* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Galina Voskoboeva | 3-6 6-1 6-0 | Vesna Dolonc | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2007* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Vesna Dolonc | 6-3 4-6 6-1 | Galina Voskoboeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Galina Voskoboeva | #1,417 | #42 | 1,284 | 1,701 | 70 | 120 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vesna Dolonc | #603 | #84 | 788 | 1,579 | 23 | 40 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Galina Voskoboeva | Vesna Dolonc | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #140 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #113 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #114 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #112 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #133 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #105 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #106 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #58 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2012 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #82 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #259 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #421 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |