H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gigi Fernandez vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-1
Gigi Fernandez and Andrea Temesvari are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on carpet, while Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1993 Hilton Head second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1993* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Gigi Fernandez | 6-3 6-2 | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1990* | Worcester | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Temesvari | 2-6 7-6 6-4 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gigi Fernandez | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |