H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Gigi Fernandez vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-2

Larisa Savchenko holds a 2–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1996 Indian Wells second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Larisa Savchenko
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 1996* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Larisa Savchenko #79 3-6 6-3 6-2 Gigi Fernandez #70 Match data
Nov 12, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Gigi Fernandez #35 7-5 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #57 Match data
Jun 12, 1992* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Larisa Savchenko #51 6-4 6-4 Gigi Fernandez #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,912 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Gigi Fernandez Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,497 0 0
1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,723 0 0 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,729 0 1 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,684 0 1 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,810 0 1 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,765 0 1 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,809 0 2 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,738 0 2 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,707 0 2 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
— — — — — — — 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2