H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gigi Fernandez vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-3
Laura Arraya holds a 3–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–0 on clay, while Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1993 Roland Garros first round 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1993* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1989* | San Juan | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-1 6-2 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1989* | Newport | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Gigi Fernandez | 6-3 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gigi Fernandez | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |