H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gigi Fernandez vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-2
Gigi Fernandez and Mercedes Paz are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1992 San Juan third round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1992* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 6-4 6-2 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 7-5 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Oct 26, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gigi Fernandez | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |