H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gigi Fernandez vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Gigi Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1991 Milan round of 16 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gigi Fernandez #17 4-6 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #114 Match data Oct 4, 1991* R16 Milan Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Gigi Fernandez #27 7-5 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #51 Match data Aug 15, 1990* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Gigi Fernandez #53 6-0 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #122 Match data Jun 21, 1989* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.