H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Gigi Fernandez vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 3-0

Gigi Fernandez holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1991 Milan fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 1991* Milan WTA 250 R16 Carpet Gigi Fernandez #17 4-6 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #114 Match data
Aug 15, 1990* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R64 Hard Gigi Fernandez #27 7-5 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #51 Match data
Jun 21, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Gigi Fernandez #53 6-0 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #122 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,912 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0
19 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0
20 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,723 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1
21 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1
22 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,729 0 1 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1
23 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,684 0 1 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,810 0 1 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1
26 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,765 0 1 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,809 0 2 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1
28 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,738 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,707 0 2 — — — — — — —