H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Gigi Fernandez vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 1-0

Gigi Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Nicole Bradtke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gigi Fernandez won the 1990 Dorado round of 16 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gigi Fernandez #29 6-4 7-6 Nicole Bradtke #50 Match data Oct 26, 1990* R16 Dorado Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gigi Fernandez Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.