H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Gigi Fernandez vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 1-1

Gigi Fernandez and Patricia Hy Boulais are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on grass, while Gigi Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1992 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-4 6-2 Gigi Fernandez #23 Match data Jun 17, 1992* R64 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Gigi Fernandez #99 6-4 6-4 Patricia Hy Boulais Match data Oct 25, 1986* SF Singapore WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gigi Fernandez Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1
33 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gigi Fernandez Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gigi Fernandez Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
33 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.