H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gigi Fernandez vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-3
Stephanie Rehe holds a 3–1 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1992 Oakland third round 6-2 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 6-2 1-0 (ret.) | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1990* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-3 6-3 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1988* | San Juan | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Gigi Fernandez | 7-6 6-7 6-3 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1986* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 6-1 6-1 | Gigi Fernandez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gigi Fernandez | #181 | #17 | 247 | 1,912 | 227 | 217 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gigi Fernandez | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1983 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #27 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #64 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #39 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #23 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #36 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #65 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #112 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |