H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Ginger Helgeson vs Caroline Vis H2H: 1-0

Ginger Helgeson holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Vis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1995 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 57 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
NED Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginger Helgeson #40 6-3 6-3 Caroline Vis #125 Match data Feb 2, 1995* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Caroline Vis #822 #111 41 1,519 6 26 18.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ginger Helgeson Caroline Vis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0 1990 1–2 33.3% #213 1,507 0 0
21 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #428 1,485 0 0
22 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0
23 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #198 1,490 0 0
24 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #120 1,449 0 0
25 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1 1995 1–6 14.3% #207 1,432 0 0
26 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% #322 1,431 0 0
27 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1
28 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1
29 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ginger Helgeson Caroline Vis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 0 6 6 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 3 14 17 17.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ginger Helgeson Caroline Vis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1989 1486 104.0 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.02 1990 1507 103.9 +44 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 -0.12
21 1990 1498 100.1 28.6% -2.00 1–0 -0.32 1991 1486 98.3 0.0% -2.25 0–2 +0.05
22 1991 1647 138.4 -14 +44 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02
23 1992 1649 128.8 +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26 1993 1491 104.6 37.5% -0.50 1–1 +0.10
24 1993 1737 139.0 -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) -0.91 1994 1449 103.0 +21 +126 27.5% -1.63 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.7 +0.21
25 1994 1777 146.6 +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21 1995 1433 113.2 -8 25.0% -1.56 0–2 0–1 -0.30
26 1995 1773 137.3 -13 +12 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 -0.56 1996 1432 110.6 0.0% -2.50 -0.19
27 1996 1721 92.9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.20
28 1997 1639 107.6 -14 -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 -0.15
29 1998 1573 99.1 +16 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00
Career 1865 140.4 -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14 1520 109.8 +17 +126 27.3% -1.55 4–9 (31%) 2–5 (29%) 95.3 -0.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.