H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Ginger Helgeson vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1992 Amelia Island round of 32 2-6 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ginger Helgeson
USA Age 57 Right-Handed
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #30 2-6 7-6 6-2 Ginger Helgeson #75 Match data Apr 9, 1992* R32 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #24 6-2 6-0 Ginger Helgeson #263 Match data Sep 14, 1990* R16 Kitzbuhel Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ginger Helgeson Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ginger Helgeson Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1997 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ginger Helgeson Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1989 1486 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.02 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1990 1498 100.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — -0.32 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1991 1647 138.4 — — — — -14 +44 — 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1992 1649 128.8 — — — — +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1993 1737 139.0 — — — — -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1994 1777 146.6 — — — — +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1995 1773 137.3 — — — — -13 +12 — 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — -0.56 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1996 1721 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.20 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1997 1639 107.6 — — — — -14 — -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.15 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1998 1573 99.1 — — — — +16 — — 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1865 140.4 — — — — -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.