H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ginger Helgeson vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2
Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1992 Amelia Island third round 2-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1992* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandra Cecchini | 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1990* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sandra Cecchini | 6-2 6-0 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sandra Cecchini | #487 | #15 | 279 | 1,937 | 299 | 215 | 58.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ginger Helgeson | Sandra Cecchini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #73 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #18 | 1,860 | 0 | 5 |
| 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #21 | 1,845 | 0 | 7 |
| 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–14 | 65.0% | #20 | 1,815 | 0 | 9 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,776 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #33 | 1,840 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #108 | 1,661 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #206 | 1,610 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,556 | 0 | 11 |