H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Ginny Purdy vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-1

Neige Dias holds a 1–0 lead over Ginny Purdy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1985 Berlin Open round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ginny Purdy
USA Age 59
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Neige Dias
BRA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neige Dias 6-2 6-0 Ginny Purdy Match data May 16, 1985* R32 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ginny Purdy — — — 1,667 26 36 41.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Neige Dias — — — 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ginny Purdy Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,493 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
16 1983 13–8 61.9% — 1,652 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1984 5–14 26.3% — 1,564 0 1 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
18 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,532 0 1 1985 6–12 33.3% — 1,527 0 0
19 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,548 0 1 1986 19–19 50.0% — 1,610 0 0
20 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,534 0 1 1987 12–15 44.4% — 1,647 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1988 25–13 65.8% — 1,712 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1989 9–10 47.4% — 1,673 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ginny Purdy Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 14 25 44.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ginny Purdy Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 96.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 — -0.12
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1497 97.5 — — — — — +31 — 50.0% -0.63 — — — +0.58
16 1983 1652 112.4 — — — — +74 -86 — 55.8% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 105.1 +2.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 1564 105.4 — — — — +90 -48 — 32.6% -0.93 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.4 +0.70 1984 1482 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.16
18 1985 1532 95.6 — — — — +60 -28 — 35.9% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.3 +1.11 1985 1528 114.5 — — — — +21 +57 — 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1986 1548 97.8 — — — — +47 — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 1–0 — +0.41 1986 1611 116.1 — — — — +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1987 1534 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01 1987 1648 123.5 — — — — -61 +20 — 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1712 129.5 — — — — -100 +84 — 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1674 112.9 — — — — — +55 — 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
Career — 1668 104.2 — — — — +73 -43 — 41.2% -0.83 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 102.5 +8.26 — 1749 122.0 — — — — -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.