H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Giulia Casoni vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-1
Judith Wiesner holds a 1–0 lead over Giulia Casoni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Judith Wiesner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Rome second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 1996* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 6-2 6-2 | Giulia Casoni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giulia Casoni | #1,150 | #83 | 392 | 1,599 | 10 | 23 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Giulia Casoni | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #398 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #358 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #156 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #91 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #285 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |