H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Giulia Casoni vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 1-0

Giulia Casoni holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Giulia Casoni leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Giulia Casoni won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4.

ITA Age 48 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 50 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Giulia Casoni #101 1-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Laurence Courtois #94 Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Giulia Casoni #1,150 #83 392 1,572 10 23 30.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laurence Courtois #484 #37 565 1,701 75 94 44.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Giulia Casoni Laurence Courtois
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #398 1,488 0 0 1993 3–3 50.0% #104 1,520 0 0
18 1996 0–1 0.0% #358 1,485 0 0 1994 8–13 38.1% #105 1,545 0 0
19 1995 14–14 50.0% #64 1,624 0 0
20 1996 20–16 55.6% #44 1,697 0 0
21 1999 2–1 66.7% #156 1,506 0 0 1997 4–9 30.8% #183 1,647 0 0
22 2000 7–9 43.8% #91 1,533 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #125 1,578 0 0
23 2001 1–10 9.1% #285 1,448 0 0 1999 13–17 43.3% #78 1,546 0 0
24 2000 6–10 37.5% #130 1,538 0 0
25 2001 3–3 50.0% #166 1,540 0 0
26 2004 0–1 0.0% #280 1,435 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Giulia Casoni Laurence Courtois
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1996 9 7 16 56.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1999 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2001 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 3 6 9 33.3% 7 14 21 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 22 31 53 41.5% 32 37 69 46.4% 9 11 20 45.0% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Giulia Casoni Laurence Courtois
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1489 98.3 0.0% -3.50 -0.02 1993 1521 107.7 +38 +20 53.3% +0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.37
18 1996 1485 101.9 0.0% -4.00 -0.20 1994 1545 117.7 +33 +35 40.0% -1.20 4–4 (50%) 3–0 (100%) +0.11
19 1995 1625 121.6 -31 -14 -24 50.0% -0.24 3–3 (50%) 8–3 (73%) 105.7 +0.28
20 1996 1698 120.0 -38 -71 -19 50.0% -0.11 11–5 (69%) 5–2 (71%) 109.5 +1.19
21 1999 1506 104.7 +40 71.4% +1.14 0–1 +0.31 1997 1648 109.2 +21 -63 37.0% -1.26 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.6 +0.08
22 2000 1533 111.8 +9 +32 42.4% -0.91 3–2 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 105.0 +0.47 1998 1579 117.9 +32 -27 41.9% -0.13 0–5 (0%) 0–1 +0.02
23 2001 1448 100.0 +58 +26 22.2% -1.82 1–4 (20%) 0–2 -0.27 1999 1546 109.3 +1 +26 +89 45.2% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 3–5 (38%) 97.3 +1.88
24 2000 1539 113.0 +52 40.0% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 -0.15
25 2001 1540 100.3 +39 47.1% -0.18 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 +0.63
26 2004 1436 94.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.04
Career 1572 105.7 +34 +32 34.2% -1.30 4–7 (36%) 4–3 (57%) 98.9 +1.03 1701 119.8 -4 +2 +6 45.3% -0.37 33–34 (49%) 26–23 (53%) 102.4 +2.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.