H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Florenta Mihai H2H: 0-2
Florenta Mihai holds a 2–0 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Florenta Mihai leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florenta Mihai won the 1977 London fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 1977* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Florenta Mihai | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1977* | Bastad | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Florenta Mihai | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Florenta Mihai | — | — | — | 1,803 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Florenta Mihai | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 30–13 | 69.8% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |