H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-2
Glynis Coles and Kate Latham are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Glynis Coles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Toronto third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kate Latham | 6-0 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kate Latham | 6-4 6-0 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1974* | St. Petersburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Glynis Coles | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1973* | Manchester | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Glynis Coles | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |