H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Nancy Richey H2H: 2-2
Glynis Coles and Nancy Richey are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Glynis Coles leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Glynis Coles won the 1977 Johannesburg third round 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 1977* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Glynis Coles | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Nancy Richey | Match data |
| Apr 29, 1976* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Nancy Richey | 6-3 6-3 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1975* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nancy Richey | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1974* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Glynis Coles | (w/o) | Nancy Richey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |