H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Glynis Coles vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 1-3

Renata Tomanova holds a 3–1 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1975 London round of 16 6-1 6-7 6-2.

GBR Age 72 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 6-1 6-7 6-2 Glynis Coles Match data Nov 14, 1975* R16 London WTA 250 Carpet
Glynis Coles 6-4 6-2 Renata Tomanova Match data Nov 9, 1975* R16 Paris WTA 500 Carpet
Renata Tomanova 7-5 6-0 Glynis Coles Match data Sep 14, 1974* F Milan Bonfiglio WTA 250 Clay
Renata Tomanova 1-6 6-3 7-5 Glynis Coles Match data Apr 21, 1973* SF Monte Carlo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Glynis Coles — — — 1,829 145 192 43.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Glynis Coles Renata Tomanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
16 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
17 1971 2–6 25.0% — 1,477 0 0 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
18 1972 15–15 50.0% — 1,595 0 0 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0
19 1973 32–19 62.7% — 1,794 0 2 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4
20 1974 21–23 47.7% — 1,694 0 2 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6
21 1975 26–21 55.3% — 1,781 0 3 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8
22 1976 13–20 39.4% — 1,720 0 3 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9
23 1977 13–19 40.6% — 1,672 0 3 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9
24 1978 8–18 30.8% — 1,555 0 3 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9
25 1979 4–6 40.0% — 1,600 0 3 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9
26 1980 4–20 16.7% — 1,461 0 3 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9
27 1981 7–12 36.8% — 1,553 0 3 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9
28 1982 0–11 0.0% — 1,475 0 3 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9
32 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,472 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Glynis Coles Renata Tomanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1971 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1972 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1974 1 2 3 33.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0%
22 1976 2 3 5 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2%
23 1977 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
24 1978 3 6 9 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
25 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1980 1 6 7 14.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1986 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 15 30 45 33.3% 59 67 126 46.8% 35 41 76 46.1% 30 50 80 37.5% — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Glynis Coles Renata Tomanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89
16 1970 1484 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64
17 1971 1477 107.5 — — — — — +18 — 29.4% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.08 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01
18 1972 1596 123.8 — — — — -44 -42 +3 46.6% -0.12 1–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.62 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54
19 1973 1795 138.7 — — — — -82 -146 -24 59.8% +0.77 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 105.2 +3.27 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96
20 1974 1694 129.5 — — — — +21 -45 +27 44.8% -0.37 7–7 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -0.55 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83
21 1975 1781 139.8 — — — — -63 -41 +17 54.6% +0.27 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 102.5 -3.69 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94
22 1976 1720 129.7 — — — — -28 -16 — 41.9% -0.85 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -2.19 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43
23 1977 1673 128.2 — — — — -20 +15 +56 46.5% -0.30 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 96.1 +0.29 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25
24 1978 1556 112.0 — — — — +32 +67 +101 37.9% -0.67 0–6 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 92.8 +1.50 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72
25 1979 1601 112.8 — — — — +33 — +38 37.5% -1.37 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -0.19 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01
26 1980 1461 99.9 — — — — +28 +53 — 23.6% -1.89 2–5 (29%) 0–2 — +1.35 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42
27 1981 1554 119.2 — — — — +46 -54 +102 36.6% -1.61 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.48 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67
28 1982 1475 93.2 — — — — +5 -45 — 12.0% -2.60 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.67 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38
32 1986 1473 102.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 130.6 — — — — -5 -36 +16 44.1% -0.47 38–48 (44%) 26–25 (51%) 98.1 +0.04 — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.