H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 1-3
Renata Tomanova holds a 3–1 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1975 London fourth round 6-1 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1975* | London | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Renata Tomanova | 6-1 6-7 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Nov 9, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Glynis Coles | 6-4 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1974* | Milan Bonfiglio | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 7-5 6-0 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1973* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 1-6 6-3 7-5 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |