H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Glynis Coles vs Sue Barker H2H: 0-3
Sue Barker holds a 3–0 lead over Glynis Coles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sue Barker leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sue Barker won the 1980 Houston third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 72
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 70
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1980* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1975* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Sue Barker | 6-2 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Sue Barker | 6-3 6-2 | Glynis Coles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glynis Coles | — | — | — | 1,835 | 144 | 190 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sue Barker | #162 | #57 | — | 2,257 | 381 | 217 | 63.7% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Glynis Coles | Sue Barker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1971 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1972 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 40–20 | 66.7% | — | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1973 | 32–19 | 62.7% | — | 1,794 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 50–19 | 72.5% | — | 1,967 | 0 | 11 |
| 20 | 1974 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 64–23 | 73.6% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 14 |
| 21 | 1975 | 26–21 | 55.3% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 51–18 | 73.9% | — | 2,107 | 1 | 16 |
| 22 | 1976 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 17 |
| 23 | 1977 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 2,017 | 1 | 20 |
| 24 | 1978 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,931 | 1 | 20 |
| 25 | 1979 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 28–18 | 60.9% | — | 1,959 | 1 | 21 |
| 26 | 1980 | 3–19 | 13.6% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,803 | 1 | 21 |
| 27 | 1981 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,750 | 1 | 22 |
| 28 | 1982 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #57 | 1,556 | 1 | 22 |
| 32 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |