H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Cheryl Jones H2H: 1-0

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Cheryl Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1985 Indianapolis 2 round of 32 0-6 7-6 6-2.

USA Age 58
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 0-6 7-6 6-2 Cheryl Jones Match data Oct 10, 1985* R32 Indianapolis 2 WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cheryl Jones #390 #250 1 1,544 5 6 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Cheryl Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1 1981 1–1 50.0% 1,498 0 0
18 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1
19 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1
20 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1
21 1985 4–3 57.1% 1,512 0 0
23 1987 0–2 0.0% #260 1,479 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Cheryl Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64 1981 1498 100.3 60.0% +0.20 0–1 +0.12
18 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32
19 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17
20 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26
21 1985 1513 105.3 55.6% +0.50 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.2 +0.29
23 1987 1480 86.9 0.0% -4.25 +0.35
Career 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93 1544 97.9 48.1% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 +6.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.