H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 1-0

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1985 Tampa round of 16 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grace Kim
USA Age 58
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Debbie Spence Nasim
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 6-3 6-1 Debbie Spence Nasim Match data Nov 8, 1985* R16 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Debbie Spence Nasim — — — 1,827 56 62 47.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Debbie Spence Nasim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1 1983 4–2 66.7% — 1,565 0 0
16 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1 1984 9–7 56.2% — 1,649 0 1
17 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1 1985 25–19 56.8% — 1,777 0 1
18 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1 1986 13–22 37.1% — 1,619 0 1
19 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1 1987 4–11 26.7% — 1,554 0 1
20 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% — 1,557 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grace Kim Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 8 8 16 50.0% 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
18 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9% — 26 27 53 49.1% 25 20 45 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Debbie Spence Nasim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06 1983 1565 107.6 — — — — +78 — — 61.5% +0.38 1–0 2–0 — +0.32
16 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48 1984 1649 120.5 — — — — +26 -52 — 55.0% +0.22 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 +0.47
17 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64 1985 1777 141.5 — — — — -50 -20 — 54.7% +0.34 7–4 (64%) 3–6 (33%) 103.0 -1.69
18 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32 1986 1619 116.9 — — — — -1 +131 -90 35.5% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 3–3 (50%) 105.9 +0.57
19 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17 1987 1555 115.2 — — — — +10 +132 — 29.0% -1.77 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.23
20 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1558 101.4 — — — — — — — 66.7% +2.33 1–0 0–1 — +0.20
Career — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93 — 1827 129.7 — — — — -4 +41 -90 46.5% -0.34 20–10 (67%) 12–13 (48%) 107.8 -0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.