H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Eileen Tell H2H: 1-0

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Eileen Tell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1982 Flemington final 6-3 2-6 6-0.

USA Age 58
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 6-3 2-6 6-0 Eileen Tell Match data Jun 20, 1982* F Flemington WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Eileen Tell — — — 1,571 7 9 43.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Eileen Tell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,586 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,592 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1 1982 5–3 62.5% — 1,539 0 0
17 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
18 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1 1984 1–1 50.0% — 1,520 0 0
19 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,497 0 0
20 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grace Kim Eileen Tell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1983 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9% — 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Eileen Tell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 1592 116.1 — — — — +64 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1984 1622 113.9 — — — — +26 — +20 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.34 1982 1539 106.2 — — — — +88 — — 57.9% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +1.43
17 1985 1695 125.4 — — — — +51 -205 -136 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.71 1983 1520 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.40
18 1986 1606 117.9 — — — — +47 -127 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +0.14 1984 1521 98.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.31
19 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +46 — -16 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.11 1985 1497 107.2 — — — — +81 — — 20.0% -1.40 — — — +0.47
20 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1706 119.2 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.78 — 1572 105.0 — — — — +86 — — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +16.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.