H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Kate Glancy H2H: 1-0

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1982 Flemington semifinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Grace Kim
USA Age 58
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Glancy
CAN Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 6-3 6-1 Kate Glancy Match data Jun 19, 1982* SF Flemington WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Kate Glancy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,585 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,591 0 1 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
16 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0
17 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0
18 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0
19 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grace Kim Kate Glancy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
16 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9% — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Kate Glancy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1983 1592 115.9 — — — — +65 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.30
16 1984 1622 113.8 — — — — +26 — +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39
17 1985 1694 125.2 — — — — +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.25
18 1986 1605 117.7 — — — — +47 -126 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32 1978 1461 102.2 — — — — +124 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.21
19 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +45 — -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26 1980 1422 87.2 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.30
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1423 99.0 — — — — +111 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.44
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +26 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.49
Career — 1705 119.1 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93 — 1582 100.7 — — — — +69 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.