H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Grace Kim vs Kate Gompert H2H: 1-0

Grace Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Gompert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grace Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Grace Kim won the 1985 Tampa round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 58
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Grace Kim 2-6 6-3 6-2 Kate Gompert Match data Nov 7, 1985* R32 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Grace Kim 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kate Gompert #316 #18 34 1,871 85 81 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Grace Kim Kate Gompert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 7–3 70.0% 1,585 0 1
15 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,591 0 1
16 1984 6–10 37.5% 1,622 0 1
17 1985 17–25 40.5% 1,694 0 1 1980 3–2 60.0% 1,538 0 0
18 1986 10–22 31.2% 1,605 0 1 1981 4–3 57.1% 1,583 0 0
19 1987 5–13 27.8% 1,515 0 1 1982 7–7 50.0% 1,588 0 0
20 1988 0–5 0.0% 1,469 0 1 1983 6–3 66.7% 1,672 0 0
21 1984 4–5 44.4% #98 1,651 0 0
22 1985 11–8 57.9% 1,724 0 0
23 1986 21–21 50.0% #35 1,781 0 0
24 1987 25–18 58.1% #22 1,830 0 0
26 1989 3–11 21.4% #175 1,659 0 0
27 1990 1–3 25.0% #301 1,621 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Grace Kim Kate Gompert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
15 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 6 6 12 50.0%
20 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1983 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
21 1984 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1986 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
24 1987 7 7 14 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 1989 2 5 7 28.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9% 37 38 75 49.3% 26 18 44 59.1% 0 6 6 0.0% 15 16 31 48.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Grace Kim Kate Gompert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1586 114.0 +73 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.42
15 1983 1592 115.9 +65 30.8% -1.00 1–0 -0.06
16 1984 1622 113.8 +26 +18 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.48
17 1985 1694 125.2 +52 -205 -135 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.64 1980 1539 117.9 60.0% +0.90 0–1 -0.24
18 1986 1605 117.7 +47 -126 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +0.32 1981 1584 114.4 +12 60.0% +0.73 0–1 -0.14
19 1987 1515 97.7 +45 -17 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 +2.17 1982 1588 109.9 -24 56.0% +0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +1.45
20 1988 1469 96.4 -61 0.0% -3.90 0–1 -0.26 1983 1673 129.7 -18 -62 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.11
21 1984 1651 117.2 -40 -19 50.0% +0.55 1–3 (25%) 1–0 +0.68
22 1985 1725 135.5 -45 -15 60.0% +0.80 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +1.32
23 1986 1781 143.3 +2 -61 -244 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 100.8 -3.20
24 1987 1830 154.9 -15 +13 56.4% +0.64 5–5 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 -2.21
26 1989 1659 99.4 +9 +88 22.6% -1.94 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -0.02
27 1990 1622 106.2 +31 33.3% -1.00 +0.25
Career 1705 119.1 +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.93 1871 143.4 -12 -7 -244 51.7% +0.26 19–19 (50%) 8–16 (33%) 97.5 -1.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.