H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Greer Stevens vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-2
Kate Latham holds a 2–1 lead over Greer Stevens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1980 US Open first round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kate Latham | 6-4 7-6 | Greer Stevens | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1977* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Greer Stevens | 6-3 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Aug 27, 1977* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kate Latham | 7-6(3) 6-1 | Greer Stevens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greer Stevens | — | — | — | 2,107 | 139 | 91 | 60.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Greer Stevens | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1973 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 28–10 | 73.7% | — | 1,826 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1976 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 4 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1977 | 19–13 | 59.4% | — | 1,912 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,968 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1979 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,925 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1980 | 36–19 | 65.5% | — | 2,015 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |