H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gretchen Magers vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-3
Isabel Cueto holds a 3–0 lead over Gretchen Magers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1990 Amelia Island fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1990* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-1 6-4 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1988* | Bastad | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Isabel Cueto | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Sep 3, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Isabel Cueto | 1-6 7-5 7-5 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Isabel Cueto | #256 | #20 | 45 | 1,885 | 130 | 101 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gretchen Magers | Isabel Cueto | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #29 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #31 | 1,826 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–12 | 66.7% | #28 | 1,817 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,799 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #117 | 1,662 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,590 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |