H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Gretchen Magers vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-3
Laura Arraya holds a 3–1 lead over Gretchen Magers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1991 Washington third round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1991 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1990* | Chicago | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 6-1 6-7 6-4 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1989* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-3 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Sep 18, 1986* | Tampa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gretchen Magers | 2-6 6-1 7-6 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gretchen Magers | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |