H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Gretchen Magers vs Sybille Niox Chateau H2H: 1-0
Gretchen Magers holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Niox Chateau in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gretchen Magers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gretchen Magers won the 1988 Auckland third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Gretchen Magers | 6-2 6-3 | Sybille Niox Chateau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sybille Niox Chateau | — | — | — | 1,531 | 16 | 35 | 31.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gretchen Magers | Sybille Niox Chateau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |