H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Gretchen Magers vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-3
Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 3–1 lead over Gretchen Magers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1992 Indian Wells second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1992* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-3 6-1 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1991* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Gretchen Magers | 6-3 6-7 6-4 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1991* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-4 6-3 | Gretchen Magers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gretchen Magers | #433 | #3 | 40 | 1,905 | 152 | 127 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gretchen Magers | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #3 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #70 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #52 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #43 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #35 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |