H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

H Sorenson vs R Hackett H2H: 1-0

H Sorenson holds a 1–0 lead over R Hackett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, H Sorenson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, H Sorenson won the 1980 Dublin round of 32 6-1 6-0.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
H Sorenson 6-1 6-0 R Hackett Match data Jul 10, 1980* R32 Dublin WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
H Sorenson 1,516 1 1 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
R Hackett 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

H Sorenson R Hackett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 1–1 50.0% 1,502 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,484 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

H Sorenson R Hackett
Yr Clay Yr Clay
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 1 1 2 50.0% Career 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

H Sorenson R Hackett
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1502 105.0 50.0% +0.75 +0.16 1980 1484 91.5 0.0% -5.50 +0.10
Career 1516 102.7 50.0% +0.75 +8.00 Career 1500 95.5 0.0% -5.50 +10.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.