H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Halle Cioffi vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-1
Laura Arraya holds a 1–0 lead over Halle Cioffi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1992 Houston fourth round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-1 | Halle Cioffi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halle Cioffi | #767 | #31 | 26 | 1,765 | 88 | 98 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Halle Cioffi | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1985 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1986 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #147 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1988 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1989 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1990 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1991 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #95 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1993 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |